5 out of 55.007 Aug 2026ID
The Best, i got my first full payout with apex
Why this review is included: Explicit initial payout receipt.
What it supports: worked-payout-receipt
Read the review at the source
90% OFF
Monthly review findings and trader experiences.
Reviews analysed
456
Aug 1, 2026 to Aug 31, 2026
Average rating
3.98
+0.00 points vs July 2026
Detailed experiences
74.6%
Of 456 reviews published this month
Mentioned an issue
47.9%
Of reviews describing a detailed experience
Monthly review brief
Reviewers describe cheap entry, helpful support and payouts that arrive. The most common complaint is the wait between payout approval and the money landing. The more serious accounts involve identity checks, account restrictions and disrupted live transfers, usually with no explanation given.
What traders said worked
Issues reviewers mention
This report describes customer reviews published during the reporting month, not necessarily events that occurred then. Allegations, payout receipts and amounts are reviewer-reported and are not independently audited. Company responses alone are not treated as proof of resolution.
Open a finding for the reported experience and its source reviews.
Positive findings from this month's report.
Reviewers report completed payouts, including repeat withdrawals
RecurringTraders describe getting first and repeat payouts, some after a long and anxious wait. That these traders were paid is not a promise that another account will be.
The Best, i got my first full payout with apex
Why this review is included: Explicit initial payout receipt.
What it supports: worked-payout-receipt
Read the review at the sourceSuccessful payouts, I trust this firm
Why this review is included: Reports successful repeat payments.
What it supports: worked-payout-receipt
Read the review at the sourceI received my payout from Apex Trader Funding.
Why this review is included: Explicit receipt in a review that also describes waiting longer than expected.
What it supports: worked-payout-receipt
Read the review at the sourcePayouts approved within minutes
RecurringReviewers repeatedly praise how fast payouts are approved. Accounts that mention both approval and receipt put days or weeks between the two, so approval speed is not payment speed.
Fast payout approval within minutes
Why this review is included: Names approval, not bank receipt, as the fast step.
What it supports: worked-fast-approval
Read the review at the sourcePayout approved in minutes, received 9 business days after request
Why this review is included: Separates rapid approval from a longer receipt interval.
What it supports: worked-fast-approval
Read the review at the sourcePayout accepted in 1 minute
Why this review is included: Describes acceptance only.
What it supports: worked-fast-approval
Read the review at the sourceHelpful answers and some concrete fixes
RecurringPositive support accounts describe clear answers, patient explanations and practical guidance. Specific recovery stories include fixing a PA purchase problem, helping obtain a delayed payout and restoring an evaluation after a reported backend error.
I had problem purchased PA accounts after passed evaluation accounts. created ticket and problem solve in a few hours.
Why this review is included: Customer explicitly reports an issue and its resolution.
What it supports: worked-support
Read the review at the sourceExcellent comunication. Doubt resolved. Very quick
Why this review is included: Reports a resolved question rather than generic praise alone.
What it supports: worked-support
Read the review at the sourceVery responsive and answered all my questions quickly
Why this review is included: Identifies the useful support action.
What it supports: worked-support
Read the review at the sourceAffordable entry and smooth PA activation
RecurringReviewers value discounted evaluations and describe straightforward purchases or transitions after passing. The evidence concerns entry and activation experiences; it does not establish that every purchaser will qualify for a payout.
Super sencillo en la compra
Why this review is included: Directly describes an easy purchase.
What it supports: worked-entry-and-funding
Read the review at the sourceA facilidade na compra e a agilidade na ativação.
Why this review is included: Reports purchase ease and quick activation.
What it supports: worked-entry-and-funding
Read the review at the sourceTheir evals are very cheap which helped me trade with a peace of mind and avoid a lot of emotions.
Why this review is included: Connects evaluation pricing to the customer's experience.
What it supports: worked-entry-and-funding
Read the review at the sourceClearer rules and progress displays help some traders
RecurringCustomers praise readable rules, account options and dashboards that explain progress toward payout eligibility. Other reviewers credit the trading structure with improved discipline. These are reported benefits, not evidence that disputed enforcement cases were correct.
Love the batch purchase options as well as the overall customization ability with any plan is awesome.
Why this review is included: Identifies specific account-choice features valued by the reviewer.
What it supports: worked-rules-and-dashboard
Read the review at the sourceGreat rules and account selection. The rules helped become more consistent and stop overtrading
Why this review is included: Explicitly links rules to a perceived behavioral benefit.
What it supports: worked-rules-and-dashboard
Read the review at the sourceThe rules have gotten clearer and the processing from evaluation to funded once paid is pretty good.
Why this review is included: Reports clearer rules and a positive funded transition.
What it supports: worked-rules-and-dashboard
Read the review at the sourceUsable trading platforms and integrations
RecurringReviewers describe smooth trading, reliable platforms and useful interfaces. Named integrations and platform choices appear in positive accounts, although separate customers report login and execution problems.
Easy to use platform.
Why this review is included: Direct usability assessment.
What it supports: worked-trading-platform
Read the review at the sourceLa respuesta de la aplicación es ágil y intuitiva
Why this review is included: Describes application responsiveness and usability.
What it supports: worked-trading-platform
Read the review at the sourceA reviewer reports a successful live-account arrival
RecurringA reviewer describes receiving a live account quickly after prior payouts. Another reports smooth live payments despite dissatisfaction with transition time and reduced account scale. These accounts do not establish a standard live-transfer timeline.
I have live accounts, already 2, payment goes smooth, it is good but compare to 20 PA accounts it is nothing.
Why this review is included: Reported live access and payments coexist with criticism of reduced scale.
What it supports: worked-live-receipt
Read the review at the sourceReported problems and what happened next.
Payout delays after approval
RecurringMoney does not follow approval. Traders describe payment invitations and confirmations that never arrive, and requests left open. Some were eventually paid; others were still waiting when they wrote. No single cause shows up in the reviews.
Haven’t got my payout in 8 business days
Why this review is included: Explicit pending payment and elapsed wait.
What it supports: incident-payout-wait
Read the review at the sourceI did not receive my pay out after 2 weeks and still waiting
Why this review is included: Customer explicitly says the delay remains unresolved.
What it supports: incident-payout-wait
Read the review at the sourceBeen waiting on a payout FOREVER! Got approved over a week ago!
Why this review is included: Locates the wait after approval.
What it supports: incident-payout-wait
Read the review at the sourceThe only downfall & pitfall with this company is the speed of reviewing, processing of payouts.
Why this review is included: Shows dissatisfaction with review and processing, not just transfer receipt.
What it supports: incident-payout-wait
Read the review at the sourceUnanswered tickets and inaccessible support channels
RecurringNegative accounts describe unanswered emails, generic replies, broken contact routes and long-running reviews without substantive updates. Problems span payouts, account access and activation deadlines. Public company replies do not establish private-case resolution.
There is no way to get in contact with them.
Why this review is included: Introduces a detailed report of a contact link failing across browsers.
What it supports: incident-support-access
Read the review at the sourceTerrible customer service.I sent E mail many times because my Apex Rithmic account can't Log in , but no reply coming back
Why this review is included: Links unanswered contact attempts to a specific access problem.
What it supports: incident-support-access
Read the review at the sourcetrying to contact support since friday. 7 days limit to activate the account but no response for 3 days now.
Why this review is included: Shows a support wait while an activation deadline is running.
What it supports: incident-support-access
Read the review at the sourceIdentity checks followed by restrictions or bans
RecurringReviewers allege identity-verification failures, inconsistent verification results and blocked appeals or helpdesk access. A separate administrative account says address approval did not lead to usable credentials. These accounts do not establish whether the underlying compliance decisions were justified.
Agent told me to verify my ID with a nickname, but doing so got my account and support desk completely banned
Why this review is included: Specific alleged sequence involving agent advice, verification and bans.
What it supports: incident-kyc
Read the review at the sourceI was banned after allegedly failing my ID verification suspiciously when I was up on my PA acc, didn’t get a chance to appeal and couldn’t even respond to their customer service either.
Why this review is included: Reports verification-linked closure and inability to appeal.
What it supports: incident-kyc
Read the review at the sourceAccounts closed and purchases blocked without explanation
RecurringCustomers describe losing account access or the ability to buy evaluations, sometimes after payouts or compliance reviews. Several say their dashboards showed no violations. Other accounts describe closures shortly after purchase or payout requests. The timing alone does not establish the company's motive.
Me banearon sin ningún motivo,bueno si,solicité un retiro de $ 29470 y me banearon
Why this review is included: Specific withdrawal request followed by alleged ban; motive remains the reviewer's interpretation.
What it supports: incident-restrictions
Read the review at the sourceMy account was suddenly restricted with PA Probation, Compliance Red Flag, and all evaluations blocked — despite my Trade Violations report clearly showing 0 Violation Pings and 0 Violation Days.
Why this review is included: Identifies the reported restriction and dashboard discrepancy.
What it supports: incident-restrictions
Read the review at the sourceToo bad I can’t give less stars , I got scammed , made an account bought a chalange and they suddenly closed my account for nothing worst prop firm ever , I don’t recommend It
Why this review is included: Reports closure after purchase, without proving the allegation of fraud.
What it supports: incident-restrictions
Read the review at the sourceDrawdown, inactivity and copy-trading rulings disputed
RecurringDisputes concern drawdown failures, inactivity, post-request losses, consistency and the interpretation of automation or copy trading. Policy objections about account longevity and payout caps also appear, but an objection alone does not establish a personal closure or denied payment.
Payout approvals are quick. Was a 5 star but I also Just got denied a payout qualified on all rules. Only reason was the
Why this review is included: Reports an actual denial, distinct from general complaints about speed.
What it supports: incident-rule-enforcement
Read the review at the sourceso i finished the 5 trading days but i broke the consistency rule made more in a day than any other?
Why this review is included: Shows confusion about consistency after completing trading days.
What it supports: incident-rule-enforcement
Read the review at the sourceLive transfers cut account access and size
RecurringSome reviewers describe waiting for live access, losing open evaluations or objecting to the replacement of simulated accounts with fewer live accounts. Other reviewers report receiving live accounts or payments. The evidence does not establish a uniform transition outcome.
Son más de 4 meses que espero mi cuenta live, y todavía no han dado signos de vida o notificaciones, tampoco puedo comprar exámenes.. alguien sabe algo?
Why this review is included: Reports a prolonged live-account wait and inability to buy evaluations.
What it supports: incident-live-transfer
Read the review at the sourceTrès déçu je viens de passer en live chez eux et j'avais 5 challenges en cours qu'ils me ferment sans me rembourser alors que j'étais en positif dessus ! Aucune réponse du service client depuis...
Why this review is included: Reports closed evaluations and missing support after the live transfer.
What it supports: incident-live-transfer
Read the review at the sourceLogin, authentication and order-handling problems
RecurringReviewers report credential failures, authentication recovery difficulties, delayed account data and trouble placing or closing orders. A customer says an evaluation was restored after a backend error; another says a position-closing failure caused a large loss without assistance. The reviews do not establish a shared technical cause.
I had an evaluation account get blown because on a volatile day it wouldn't let me close a trade and some backend stuff caused the wrong instrument to trade when I was trying to fix it.
Why this review is included: Specific order-handling failure in a review that later reports restoration.
What it supports: incident-platform-and-access
Read the review at the sourceCant even sign back in after ive passed the evaluation. Says contact website administrador and i did and no response.
Why this review is included: Specific post-evaluation login failure and unanswered contact.
What it supports: incident-platform-and-access
Read the review at the sourceRenewal charges, activation costs and purchase mistakes
RecurringCustomers report unwanted subscription renewals and delayed refund escalation. Other complaints concern activation costs or buying the wrong platform or account through the purchase interface. A separate reviewer alleges an unauthorized charge without prior familiarity with the firm; that allegation is not independently verified.
Bought wrong account cause of site interface, poor support.
Why this review is included: Specific purchase-interface complaint rather than general price sentiment.
What it supports: incident-purchase-and-billing
Read the review at the sourceI have never heard of then and they have took $425 out of my account without my knowledge or permission
Why this review is included: Specific unauthorized-charge allegation; not evidence of subscription renewal.
What it supports: incident-purchase-and-billing
Read the review at the sourceReviewer-reported payout experiences. Topic counts can overlap; the most-mentioned appear first.
Mentioned a payout
50.7%
Of all reviews published this month
Described it positively
40.3%
Of reviews that mentioned a payout
Went through cleanly
104
Reviews describing no payout problem
Hit a problem
127
Reviews describing a payout problem
Money stalls after approval: missing Plane invitations or confirmations, requests left under review, transfers that never landed, and withdrawal eligibility blocked by an account restriction. One denial tied to later trading losses is a different outcome from a payment that is simply late.
Approval is fast, receipt often is not. Some traders call payment quick or on time; others waited far longer than expected. There is no dependable end-to-end timeline in the reviews.
Only methods and amounts reviewers explicitly named.
Amounts described
EUR 1300, USD 6000, USD 600, USD 1050
Money stalls after approval: missing Plane invitations or confirmations, requests left under review, transfers that never landed, and withdrawal eligibility blocked by an account restriction. One denial tied to later trading losses is a different outcome from a payment that is simply late.
| Problem | Reviews | What reviewers described |
|---|---|---|
| payout-delay | 95 | 95 reviews matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Account activation prevents payout access | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Account closed before payout eligibility | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Account closure following approval | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Problem | Reviews | What reviewers described |
|---|---|---|
| Account liquidation before payout | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Approved payout unpaid; title alleges refusal | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Ban after withdrawal request | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Difficult eligibility; specifics absent | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Disputed dashboard profit calculation | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Eligibility rules | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| General allegation of exclusion after withdrawals | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| General denial allegation; no personal payout case described | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| General rejection allegation; no specific payout case | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Initial process confusion | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| KYC-related account block | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Missing status communication | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Missing transferred payment | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Objection to current withdrawal policies | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Objection to payout cap and account expiry | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| payout-denial | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Product-policy critique; no personal payout event | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Required buffer | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Speculation only; no payout experience described | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Trade-ownership audit flags | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Unspecified difficulty getting paid | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
| Unspecified payout-request issue | 1 | 1 review matched this reported problem pattern. |
Stated reasons include missing payout details, first-time payment-provider setup, wrong bank details, and account or compliance conditions. Some explanations are disputed, some are the reviewer guessing. No single reason explains the delays.
Most-mentioned topics first. Counts can overlap because a review may mention several rules. See the Rules tab for the rules themselves.
Traders praise the rules for being clear, especially where the dashboard shows eligibility and consistency. The real disputes are drawdown, inactivity, losses taken after a payout request, and how automation or copy trading is judged. Disliking payout caps or account expiry is not the same as losing an account to them.
| What was disputed | Reviews | Consequence described | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Account closure after maximum withdrawals | 1 | Reviewer objects to policy; personal closure not stated | payout |
| Account failure despite remaining threshold | 1 | Account blown | trading |
| Automation and copy-trading interpretation | 1 | Accounts closed despite reviewer asserting personally determined entries and exits | trading |
| Consistency and post-evaluation conditions | 1 | Reviewer says access to profits is difficult | payout |
| What was disputed | Reviews | Consequence described | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current withdrawal policies | 1 | Not consistently stated. | payout |
| Document and selfie verification refusal | 1 | Reviewer says money spent on evaluations was lost | kyc |
| Drawdown breach after losing trade | 1 | Account deactivated after evaluation pass | trading |
| Drawdown failure relative to reported losses | 1 | Account entered liquidation mode and disappeared | trading |
| Evaluation time limit | 1 | Reviewer considers available trading time restrictive | evaluation |
| Evaluation time limit and account-dependent drawdown/fees | 1 | Reviewer argues these encourage riskier trading | evaluation |
| Failed ID verification | 1 | Banned without opportunity to appeal | kyc |
| Funded-account activity requirement | 1 | Warnings to trade more frequently | funding |
| Funded payout eligibility and qualifying profit days | 1 | Reviewer considers minimum daily profits and number of days excessive | payout |
| ID verification outcome | 1 | Account blocked without explanation | kyc |
| ID verification using a nickname | 1 | Account and support desk banned after following alleged agent advice | kyc |
| Inactivity warnings during payout wait | 1 | Reviewer feels pressured to trade and fears denial; denial not reported | trading |
| Intraday drawdown hard failure | 1 | Account frozen and failed despite reviewer disputing threshold breach | trading |
| KYC discrepancies | 1 | Account closure and helpdesk block | kyc |
| Legacy-plan replacement | 1 | Reviewer prefers prior account longevity | purchase |
| Live-account capacity compared with PA accounts | 1 | Live accounts received but reviewer dislikes reduced scale | move_to_live |
| Live transfer replacing simulated accounts | 1 | Reviewer objects to reduced account capacity | move_to_live |
| MEA 30% rule and balance adjustment | 1 | Reviewer alleges balance reduction caused account failure | trading |
| Multiple compliance violations despite clear dashboard | 1 | New evaluation purchases blocked | purchase |
| New evaluations and payout limits | 1 | Considering other firms | payout |
| New qualifying profit-day rules and exclusion after payouts | 1 | Alleges unexplained closures; personal event not established | payout |
| No new purchases after losing live status | 1 | Objection to future access restriction; live loss not reported | move_to_live |
| Open position after session cutoff | 1 | Cited as deactivation reason | trading |
| PA activation deadline during authentication recovery | 1 | Reviewer says PA opportunity was lost | funding |
| PA probation and compliance red flag despite no displayed violations | 1 | Evaluations blocked; account later closed at reviewer request | funding |
| Paid evaluation access revoked shortly after purchase | 1 | No service or refund; chargeback filed | purchase |
| Payout buffer | 1 | Buffer cannot be withdrawn | payout |
| Payout caps and EOD account longevity | 1 | Wants larger withdrawals and permanent scalable EOD accounts | payout |
| Post-request trading losses | 1 | Payout denied despite reviewer believing all requirements were met | payout |
| Profitable-day requirement and maximum payout count | 1 | Reviewer says evaluations must restart after payout cap | payout |
| Qualifying profit-day calculation | 1 | Reviewer says payout eligibility was delayed | payout |
| Removal of legacy plans | 1 | Reviewer dislikes reduced options | purchase |
| Restriction on further account purchases | 1 | Reviewer says access blocked despite no serious violations | purchase |
| Rolling inactivity requirement: two profitable days above $50 within 30 days | 1 | PA deactivated despite claimed compliance | trading |
| Simulated-account consolidation into live program | 1 | Reviewer says earning capacity reduced | move_to_live |
| Subscription cancellation | 1 | Reports a 90-dollar reset charge after cancellation | purchase |
| Trade ownership and correlation audits | 1 | Payouts or accounts flagged | trading |
| Trading after session cutoff | 1 | Reviewer denies trading after the stated cutoff | trading |
| Trailing drawdown liquidation | 1 | PA closed; reviewer disputes that cited rule permits liquidation | trading |
| Unexplained bans | 1 | General allegation; personal case not described | Not consistently stated. |
| Unwanted evaluation renewals and refund handling | 1 | Reviewer attributes subsequent account losses to expiry pressure during refund delay | purchase |
| Withdrawal compliance | 1 | Reviewer says all requirements were fulfilled but review continues | payout |
This section looks at what happened to the customers who needed help.
126 reviews involved support.
Support outcomes
Positive 61.1%, Negative 37.3%, Mixed 0.8%, Not Stated 0.8%
Support answers routine questions well and delivers real fixes. On payouts and compliance, traders describe silence, canned replies and contact routes that do not work. A good answer about a purchase says nothing about how a payout case is handled.
Helped
Did not help
Chosen for how much they explain, whether positive or negative. Each one says why it was picked.
The Best, i got my first full payout with apex
Why this review is included: Explicit initial payout receipt.
What it supports: worked-payout-receipt
Read the review at the sourceSuccessful payouts, I trust this firm
Why this review is included: Reports successful repeat payments.
What it supports: worked-payout-receipt
Read the review at the sourceI received my payout from Apex Trader Funding.
Why this review is included: Explicit receipt in a review that also describes waiting longer than expected.
What it supports: worked-payout-receipt
Read the review at the sourceFast payout approval within minutes
Why this review is included: Names approval, not bank receipt, as the fast step.
What it supports: worked-fast-approval
Read the review at the sourceThe same firm can be easy to buy from and hard to get paid by. Splitting reviews by stage keeps that visible.
17.1% of reviews tagged to a stage.
Worked
Went wrong
11.0% of reviews tagged to a stage.
Worked
Went wrong
8.8% of reviews tagged to a stage.
Worked
Went wrong
1.3% of reviews tagged to a stage.
Worked
Went wrong
25.2% of reviews tagged to a stage.
Worked
Went wrong
48.7% of reviews tagged to a stage.
Worked
Went wrong
1.5% of reviews tagged to a stage.
Worked
Went wrong
10.3% of reviews tagged to a stage.
Worked
Went wrong
Monthly figures from the same review analysis.
| Month | Review volume |
|---|---|
| Jul 26 | 481 |
| Aug 26 | 456 |
Reviews in this month
456
-5.2%vs July 2026
Average rating
3.98 out of 53.98
+0.00 points vs July 2026
456 reviews, grouped by star rating.
Shares are of this month’s total review count.
No issue mentioned
Of detailed experiences
Mentioned an issue
Of detailed experiences
Where reviewers said what happened next. Silence is counted as unknown, not as unresolved.
How incidents ended
Not Stated 49.7%, Unresolved 38.7%, Resolved 8.0%, Partial 3.1%, Compensated 0.6%
Detail is what makes a review checkable, so it is measured rather than assumed.
Daily review counts for the selected month.
August
| M | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | ||||||
| F | ||||||
Hover or tap a day for the number of reviews posted.
The review peak has no single cause
Reviews cluster on one date in the month. They mix payout reports, support experiences and account complaints, so nothing in them points to a shared incident or campaign behind the peak.
Payout speed
Approved in minutes, paid days or weeks later
Support
Good on routine questions, silent on disputes
Account access
Restrictions, bans and live transfers cut access
Patterns in reviewers’ experiences.
Positive themesA fit for traders who want cheap evaluations, a choice of account sizes, visible progress tracking and a clear route to a payout. Reviewers also say support is useful while you learn the process.
Recurring concernsBe careful if you need withdrawn money on a predictable date, need your account to keep working without interruption, or want a straight answer when a compliance or technical problem hits. A smooth purchase or a fast approval says nothing about those.
Scores out of 10 · August 2026
Satisfaction
8.0/ 10
Ratings lean positive, but individual reviews name friction the headline score hides.
Trust
5.2/ 10
Traders who were paid trust the firm. Unexplained restrictions and unanswered tickets destroy that trust for others.
Payouts
4.0/ 10
Approval, payment-provider setup and money in the bank are three separate steps. Both completed payments and stuck requests appear.
Support
6.2/ 10
Support fixes routine problems well and becomes hard to reach once a payout or compliance dispute starts.
Rules
5.2/ 10
Reviewers credit clear rules and better discipline, while others dispute how the rules were applied and object to account-longevity terms.
Overall
5.7/ 10
Cheap, easy entry; real uncertainty about when a payout lands and how a restricted account is handled.